A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside a north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted nationwide focus pursuing an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of setting up breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Situations posting about René Collier as well as Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction functions at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, find to build their spouse and children property. The situation has become emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, wherever development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of recognized citizens. In accordance with the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being constructed by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally inhabitants of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their arranging permission by developing a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result places are issue to rigorous controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological effects, notably inside a sensitive coastal environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their preparing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal preparing disputes, where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waistline-large water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, a picture that has since come to be emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential second inside the authorized timeline.
On the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as produced, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject claims that the case is about preserving a private perspective, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out based upon Experienced guidance and accepted options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea throughout a storm, tend not to change the fundamental facts.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as increasingly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water during a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are René Collier and Paul Feely phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily actuality with the coastline as well as symbolic nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays unsure. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up ailments. Nevertheless the human aspect remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay together with one another long after the lawful expenses are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case extend beyond that deal with. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition it underscores how promptly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary difficulties for example environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it'll in the end be altered, eliminated, or completed as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.